Caltrans has released the SR-710 Alternatives Analysis report outlining the details of the five possible options to extend the 710 northward.
Be sure to review it and send your comments to Caltrans and Metro.
UPDATE: Najarian Voted Back on the MTA Board for Another 4 Years, 3/9/2013
Najarian Voted Off MTA Board (PDF)
No 710 Action Committee condemns
Fasana and Messina, 12/11/2012
No 710 Action Committee (PDF)
Position Statement, 9/2012
December 11 Wednesday: 1:30 - 5:00 PM
California Transportation Commission (CTC) Meeting
An update on the SR-710 North Study does appear on the agenda. This is an important opportunity to speak to the Commission about the SR-710 North study.
Riverside County Administration Building, Supervisors' Chambers, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. Carpool info to the meeting Email Unitedagainst710@gmail.com
December 11 Wednesday: 5:30 – 7:30 PM
Mobility 21 is hosting a Reception after the meeting (sponsored by CH2MHill, Parsons and other firms).
Mission Inn, registration is required (by this Friday, Dec. 6) and a nominal fee.
December 12 Thursday: 6:01 – 8:55 PM
The Transit Coalition
Hear Metro CEO Art Leahy tell details about P3. Measure R++
Metro Gateway Headquarters, Union Station Conference Room One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012
January 25 Saturday: 10:00 AM
City of Pasadena North west Commission 710 Freeway Forum
Community Forum about the 710 Freeway
John Muir High School Auditorium, 1905 North Lincoln AV, Pasadena, CA 91103
For more info contact: Lola Osborne, Northwest Programs Manager at losborne@city of pasadena.net, 626 744-4791
February 19 Wednesday, Time TBA
Metro's State Route 710 EIR/EIS Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
February 20 Thursday, Time TBA
Metro's State Route 710 EIR/EIS Stakeholder Outreach Advisory (SOAC) Meeting
Remember to always refresh your browser when going
to these pages to see new information
The No 710 Action Committee
is a fast growing association of cities, organizations, professionals and citizens who realize that the SR-710 tunnel is an unacceptable alternative to address regional transportation problems. Our mission is to promote solutions that are environmentally and fiscally sound, reduce pollution, lower health risks, relieve congestion, and eliminate public dependence on fossil fuels. The No 710 Action Committee demands that transit authorities operate in an honest and transparent manner that is responsive to the concerns and interests of the impacted communities and the public at large.
Why the SR-710 (Tunnel) is a Bad Idea
- The SR-710 North Extension is not being built for commuters. It's intended as part of a goods movement system that ties into the Expansion of the I-710 Freeway and the High Desert Corridor.1
- These 4.9 mile tunnels will not have exits or onramps, further demonstrating that it is not designed for local commuters, but pass-through traffic from the Ports.
- The SR-710 North Extension (tunnel(s) would connect the lower I-710 Freeway with the already heavily congested I-210 Freeway which will lead to gridlock conditions for everyone.2
- Cost - Government sources have quoted project cost ranges between $1 - $14 billion to build the tunnel. The current figures being used by LACMTA is $5.425 billion and SCAG is $5.636 billion. The smaller "Big Dig" tunnel, (only 3.5-mile long) was estimated to cost $2.8 billion in 1982 dollars.3 However, the Boston Globe has estimated that the project will ultimately cost $24 billion,3 including interest, and that it will not be paid off until 2038.3
- To pay for the huge construction and upkeep costs (lacking in current estimates), a public-private partnership must be forged. These investors need to make a profit from this deal and tolls will be charged. Tolls create diversion traffic.4 Drivers unwilling to pay the "average" fees of $5.64 for cars and $15.23 for cargo trucks5 will likely take the "short cut" through local neighborhood streets.
- InfraConsult, a financial consultant, provided a forecast volume of 190,000 annual average daily traffic in the SR-710 North Tunnel for the year 2030 to which a diversion rate of 35% has been applied.4 It is possible that a public-private partnership for the 710 tunnel(s) will fail like other toll roads because the forecasts were based on FLAWED traffic projections6 and traffic volumes may be much lower than expected.7
- The risk of being killed in a traffic accident occurring in a tunnel is twice as high as on open stretches of motorways.8
- Roadway tunnels are inherently dangerous. If a fire occurs, there is no easy way out of a tunnel, especially for those with limited mobility.9
- Vehicle exhaust cannot be properly filtered and will lead to health issues not only for the drivers who use the tunnel10 but also for the surrounding communities where the exhaust is vented.11